At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | Ninebot Max G2 | Phantom |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 69 km | 100 km |
| Battery | 0.6 kWh | 1.6 kWh |
| Efficiency | 0.8 kWh/100km | 1.6 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~0 min | ~0 min |
| Seats | 1 | 1 |
| Price | $899 | $2,500 |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $18 | $36 |
The Ninebot Max G2 wins 3 of 8 categories, making it our pick in this head-to-head.
Range & efficiency
The Ninebot Max G2 is rated for 69 km of range versus 100 km for the Phantom. That is a difference of about 31 km, which matters most if you do regular long trips.
The Ninebot Max G2 consumes about 0.8 kWh per 100 km versus 1.6 kWh for the Phantom - so the Ninebot Max G2 is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Charging time depends on the charger and battery temperature; the lower 10-80% figure means shorter stops on long trips.
Space & comfort
The Ninebot Max G2 seats 1 and the Phantom seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The Ninebot Max G2 lists at $899 and the Phantom at $2,500. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $18/yr versus $36/yr.
Verdict
The Ninebot Max G2 is our pick, taking 3 of 8 categories in this head-to-head. It leads on the lower consumption (0.8 kWh/100km vs 1.6 kWh/100km), the better price ($899 vs $2,500) and the higher rating (4.6/5 vs 4.5/5). That said, the Phantom is still the better buy if you need the longer range (100 km vs 69 km).