At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | R1S | Taycan |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 507 km | 570 km |
| Battery | 135 kWh | 89 kWh |
| Efficiency | 23.9 kWh/100km | 19.1 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.1 s | 5.4 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~40 min | ~22 min |
| Seats | 7 | 4 |
| Price | $78,000 | $90,000 |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.7/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $538 | $430 |
Both models win 4 of 8 categories - the decision comes down to your priorities.
Range & efficiency
The R1S is rated for 507 km of range versus 570 km for the Taycan. That is a difference of about 63 km, which matters most if you do regular long trips.
The R1S consumes about 23.9 kWh per 100 km versus 19.1 kWh for the Taycan - so the Taycan is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
The R1S reaches 100 km/h in 3.1 seconds versus 5.4 for the Taycan. R1S is the quicker car, though real-world feel also depends on power delivery and weight.
Charging
Fast charging from 10-80% takes about 40 minutes in the R1S and 22 minutes in the Taycan. Taycan spends less time at the plug on road trips.
Space & comfort
The R1S seats 7 and the Taycan seats 4. Cargo volume is roughly 2945 L versus 407 L.
Price & running costs
The R1S lists at $78,000 and the Taycan at $90,000. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $538/yr versus $430/yr.
Verdict
It is genuinely close - both models win 4 of 8 categories each. Pick the R1S if you value quicker acceleration (0-100 in 3.1 s), more seats (7). Pick the Taycan if you value longer range (570 km), faster charging (10-80% in ~22 min), better efficiency (19.1 kWh/100km). Either way, you are getting one of the best options in its class.