At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | Felo FW | MQi GT EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 100 km | 90 km |
| Battery | 3 kWh | 4.2 kWh |
| Efficiency | 3 kWh/100km | 4.7 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~0 min | ~0 min |
| Seats | 1 | 1 |
| Price | $5,000 | $4,500 |
| Rating | 4.1/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $68 | $106 |
The MQi GT EVO wins 3 of 8 categories, making it our pick in this head-to-head.
Range & efficiency
The Felo FW is rated for 100 km of range versus 90 km for the MQi GT EVO. That is effectively a tie - neither offers a meaningful range advantage.
The Felo FW consumes about 3 kWh per 100 km versus 4.7 kWh for the MQi GT EVO - so the Felo FW is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Charging time depends on the charger and battery temperature; the lower 10-80% figure means shorter stops on long trips.
Space & comfort
The Felo FW seats 1 and the MQi GT EVO seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The Felo FW lists at $5,000 and the MQi GT EVO at $4,500. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $68/yr versus $106/yr.
Verdict
The MQi GT EVO is our pick, taking 3 of 8 categories in this head-to-head. It leads on the larger battery (3 kWh vs 4.2 kWh), the better price ($5,000 vs $4,500) and the higher rating (4.1/5 vs 4.2/5). That said, the Felo FW is still the better buy if you plan to keep it long-term (roughly $38/yr cheaper to run), or you need the longer range (100 km vs 90 km).