At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | MQi GT EVO | NQi GT |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 90 km | 100 km |
| Battery | 4.2 kWh | 3.4 kWh |
| Efficiency | 4.7 kWh/100km | 3.4 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~0 min | ~0 min |
| Seats | 1 | 1 |
| Price | $4,500 | $3,999 |
| Rating | 4.2/5 | 4.1/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $106 | $77 |
The NQi GT wins 3 of 8 categories, making it our pick in this head-to-head.
Range & efficiency
The MQi GT EVO is rated for 90 km of range versus 100 km for the NQi GT. That is effectively a tie - neither offers a meaningful range advantage.
The MQi GT EVO consumes about 4.7 kWh per 100 km versus 3.4 kWh for the NQi GT - so the NQi GT is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Charging time depends on the charger and battery temperature; the lower 10-80% figure means shorter stops on long trips.
Space & comfort
The MQi GT EVO seats 1 and the NQi GT seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The MQi GT EVO lists at $4,500 and the NQi GT at $3,999. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $106/yr versus $77/yr.
Verdict
The NQi GT is our pick, taking 3 of 8 categories in this head-to-head. It leads on the longer range (90 km vs 100 km), the lower consumption (4.7 kWh/100km vs 3.4 kWh/100km) and the better price ($4,500 vs $3,999). That said, the MQi GT EVO is still the better buy if local incentives, dealer offers or brand preference swing it for you.