At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | CE 04 | SR/S |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 130 km | 301 km |
| Battery | 8.9 kWh | 15.6 kWh |
| Efficiency | 6.8 kWh/100km | 5.2 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~0 min | ~60 min |
| Seats | 2 | 1 |
| Price | $16,000 | $24,195 |
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $153 | $117 |
The SR/S wins 4 of 8 categories, making it our pick in this head-to-head.
Range & efficiency
The CE 04 is rated for 130 km of range versus 301 km for the SR/S. That is a difference of about 171 km, which matters most if you do regular long trips.
The CE 04 consumes about 6.8 kWh per 100 km versus 5.2 kWh for the SR/S - so the SR/S is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Charging time depends on the charger and battery temperature; the lower 10-80% figure means shorter stops on long trips.
Space & comfort
The CE 04 seats 2 and the SR/S seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The CE 04 lists at $16,000 and the SR/S at $24,195. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $153/yr versus $117/yr.
Verdict
The SR/S is our pick, taking 4 of 8 categories in this head-to-head. It leads on the longer range (130 km vs 301 km), the larger battery (8.9 kWh vs 15.6 kWh) and the lower consumption (6.8 kWh/100km vs 5.2 kWh/100km). That said, the CE 04 is still the better buy if you are on a tighter budget (it is $8,195 cheaper), or you regularly carry more passengers (2 seats vs 1).