At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | Experia | SR/S |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 420 km | 301 km |
| Battery | 22.5 kWh | 15.6 kWh |
| Efficiency | 5.4 kWh/100km | 5.2 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~40 min | ~60 min |
| Seats | 1 | 1 |
| Price | $25,880 | $24,195 |
| Rating | 4.2/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $122 | $117 |
Both models win 3 of 8 categories - the decision comes down to your priorities.
Range & efficiency
The Experia is rated for 420 km of range versus 301 km for the SR/S. That is a difference of about 119 km, which matters most if you do regular long trips.
The Experia consumes about 5.4 kWh per 100 km versus 5.2 kWh for the SR/S - so the SR/S is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Fast charging from 10-80% takes about 40 minutes in the Experia and 60 minutes in the SR/S. Experia spends less time at the plug on road trips.
Space & comfort
The Experia seats 1 and the SR/S seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The Experia lists at $25,880 and the SR/S at $24,195. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $122/yr versus $117/yr.
Verdict
It is genuinely close - both models win 3 of 8 categories each. Pick the Experia if you value longer range (420 km), faster charging (10-80% in ~40 min). Pick the SR/S if you value better efficiency (5.2 kWh/100km). Either way, you are getting one of the best options in its class.