At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | One | SR/S |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 235 km | 301 km |
| Battery | 15.4 kWh | 15.6 kWh |
| Efficiency | 6.6 kWh/100km | 5.2 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~60 min | ~60 min |
| Seats | 1 | 1 |
| Price | $17,900 | $24,195 |
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $149 | $117 |
The SR/S wins 4 of 8 categories, making it our pick in this head-to-head.
Range & efficiency
The One is rated for 235 km of range versus 301 km for the SR/S. That is a difference of about 66 km, which matters most if you do regular long trips.
The One consumes about 6.6 kWh per 100 km versus 5.2 kWh for the SR/S - so the SR/S is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Fast charging from 10-80% takes about 60 minutes in the One and 60 minutes in the SR/S. SR/S spends less time at the plug on road trips.
Space & comfort
The One seats 1 and the SR/S seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The One lists at $17,900 and the SR/S at $24,195. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $149/yr versus $117/yr.
Verdict
The SR/S is our pick, taking 4 of 8 categories in this head-to-head. It leads on the longer range (235 km vs 301 km), the larger battery (15.4 kWh vs 15.6 kWh) and the lower consumption (6.6 kWh/100km vs 5.2 kWh/100km). That said, the One is still the better buy if you are on a tighter budget (it is $6,295 cheaper).