At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | DSR/X | SR/S |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 290 km | 301 km |
| Battery | 17.3 kWh | 15.6 kWh |
| Efficiency | 6 kWh/100km | 5.2 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~60 min | ~60 min |
| Seats | 1 | 1 |
| Price | $24,500 | $24,195 |
| Rating | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $135 | $117 |
The SR/S wins 3 of 8 categories, making it our pick in this head-to-head.
Range & efficiency
The DSR/X is rated for 290 km of range versus 301 km for the SR/S. That is effectively a tie - neither offers a meaningful range advantage.
The DSR/X consumes about 6 kWh per 100 km versus 5.2 kWh for the SR/S - so the SR/S is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Fast charging from 10-80% takes about 60 minutes in the DSR/X and 60 minutes in the SR/S. SR/S spends less time at the plug on road trips.
Space & comfort
The DSR/X seats 1 and the SR/S seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The DSR/X lists at $24,500 and the SR/S at $24,195. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $135/yr versus $117/yr.
Verdict
The SR/S is our pick, taking 3 of 8 categories in this head-to-head. It leads on the longer range (290 km vs 301 km), the lower consumption (6 kWh/100km vs 5.2 kWh/100km) and the better price ($24,500 vs $24,195). That said, the DSR/X is still the better buy if local incentives, dealer offers or brand preference swing it for you.